Sorting all the eggs of the landscape (credits)

Dear readers, this week Data News lands on Saturday and will be a little bit different than usual because I found less relevant article and as promised last week I wanted to speak about the MAD Landscape.

I hope you will enjoy this topic focus edition where I speak about economics even if I'm a newbie about economy. In last minute I also added stuff about the Silicon Valley Bank that has been seized by the US FDIC, which will generate a crisis in scale-ups/startups world.

The MAD landscape

The Machine learning, Artificial intelligence & Data (MAD) Landscape is a company index that has been initiated in 2012 by Matt Turck a Managing Director at First Mark. First Mark is a NYC VC, in their portfolio they have Dataiku, ClickHouse and Astronomer among other tech or B2C companies.

Evolution between 2012 and 2023. We jumped from 142 logos to 1414, the world changed but Pig remains. (credits: mattturck.com)

Year after year the MAD Landscape has become an important tool to index the whole data landscape. The choice of categories is also a very clear way to categorise companies and to capture how the data field is changing. Obviously this kind of index is opinionated and they—Matt and his team—make editorial choices when they decide to include—or not—a company, but still, their selection depicts a reality.

Today I want to do a second lecture of the 4-parts article Matt wrote and to give my views on it. As Matt said in a LinkedIn live with Joe Reis the MAD landscape was not published last year (2022) because of time and the landscape has been totally shaken by 2 major events: the massive layoffs wave and the generative AI hype. As a reminder in 2021 edition money was flowing, Databricks did 2 huge rounds with $2.6b raised and Snowflake IPO was a success one year after.

In the MAD landscape we have 3 main parts that I will discuss about today:

Before going more into category changes and macro trends this MAD capture there are a few interesting facts highlighting some biais this index might have:

Mainly what these fact are saying is that the MAD landscape is dominated by US-based companies and US-based companies are nowadays thinking how the world should do data, trying to replicate their problem and their vision to everyone. Which is kinda broken. Obviously there are companies or VCs in Europe/Asia but rare are the one with the same impact. Diversity-wise this is a world dominated by the Northern Hemisphere (as always), there is no company in Africa or Southern America for instance.

Key insights

In a nutshell here are the key insights you need to know if you do want to read Matt's notes. First regarding data infrastructure:

ℹ️
tl;dr — Less money everywhere, optimisation everywhere. The golden age of flooding money is done. We will aim for a simplification of everything because often simple means less cash burn. Less everything.

After infrastructure Matt also writes about all AI impacts:

In addition to this O'Reilly released their technology trends from the searches on their website, when we only focus on the data field what we see is:

Silicon Valley Bank—wat?

🤞(credits)

This is a bit last minute but this is freaking huge. Let me do a recap for you and why does it matter.

The Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) is a deposit bank based in California and has the biggest market share. SVB manages billions dollars of assets. Mainly the assets are coming from Silicon Valley startups, founders and employees. In a nutshell if you are a startup founder and you get millions from a seed round you put the money in the SVB.

2-3 years ago a lot of money was raised, the SVB got around $200 billion in deposit. The SVB wanted to put $80 billion of this money at work using Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS)—just as a reminder MBS were at the center of the 2008 financial crisis. MBS guarantees 1.5% return and because interests rates were low because of the pandemic it was ok.

In the last months the FED increased rates crossing recently the 4.5% mark which still was ok. But started triggering chain reaction of all actors. The SVB did a first mistake that I'm not able to explain.

Then VCs started panicking (e.g. Peter Thiel's) advising founders and startups to get the money out of the SVB. Which led to a bank run.

A bank run or run on the bank occurs when many clients withdraw their money from a bank, because they believe the bank may cease to function in the near future

Then the SVB did another mistake. One day later the stock was 60% down and later the same day the bank collapsed.

What happened here is huge and will have a big impact on every US-based scale-ups/startups—it's very well linked to the MAD landscape. Mainly the deposits were only insured until 250k and it means that a lot of companies will lack of cash and probably have difficulties to pay salaries and/or vendors soon.

As a reaction it'll, sadly, imply more layoffs in the coming days and weeks. Other are also afraid of a contagion to the whole banking system as the SVB collapse became the second-largest collapse of the US history.

Data Economy 💰


See you next week with an usual Data News ❤️.